Deadlock’s Endless Low Priority Thread Turned Into A Fight Over Reports, Weird Builds, And Griefing

The Deadlock forum thread titled “Possible Low Priority System Bug / Endless LP Queue Cycle” started as a punishment-system complaint. By page two, it had become something more interesting: a fight over reports, weird playstyles, and who gets to decide what griefing looks like.

The original report was already dramatic. A player described being stuck in low priority even after clearing games, creating the impression of an endless penalty loop. That is the systems version of the complaint. The community version is uglier.

One reply on page two argues that the situation is obviously unintended, while also acknowledging that the original poster plays in a frustrating way. The same reply draws the line Valve will eventually have to draw: if a player is trying to win, even in a way teammates hate, is mass-reporting them into low priority actually justice, or just a social weapon?

This is where Deadlock’s report system gets hard. Competitive players want tools to punish griefers, throwers, AFK players, slur machines, and people who make games miserable on purpose. They also want the freedom to play off-meta builds, strange routes, and hero styles that look insane until they work. Those two desires collide the second a lobby decides “I hate this” means “this is reportable.”

The thread does not prove a report-brigade happened. It does show the argument forming around one. That matters because Deadlock’s culture is getting more confident about public trials: screenshots, match IDs, social pressure, streamer opinions, and forum replies all become evidence in a case where the actual penalty system is still opaque.

If Valve wants low priority to be trusted, players need to understand what behavior gets them there and how they get out. Otherwise every punishment becomes content, every weird build becomes a liability, and every report button starts looking less like moderation and more like lobby democracy with a grudge.